Morgan v. Bell
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Miami District Court. Bell brought this action to recover damages for injuries which he received by being bitten by a dog belonging to defendant Morgan. Trial by jury at the June term, 1887, and judgment for the plaintiff for $100. Defendant brings the case here for review.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Clogston, C.:
This was an action brought to recover damages for injuries sustained by reason of the bite of a vicious dog, the property of the defendant. At the trial the defendant submitted and asked the court to give certain instructions, which were refused, and this is now assigned as error. There were no exceptions taken to the instructions given by the court to the jury, and the instructions asked for by the defendant were substantially included in the general charge of the court, and we see no error in refusing to give the instructions asked by the defendant after what had…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Parker v. BatesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
3Cited by7 opinions
- Eisminger v. BemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- State v. ZeilingerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Huster v. WynnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
- Lookabaugh v. BowmakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Dunham v. BokelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.