Legal Opinion

Trident Center v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 5, 1988No. 87-6085, 87-6267PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge:

The parties to this transaction are, by any standard, highly sophisticated business people: Plaintiff is a partnership consisting of an insurance company and two of Los Angeles’ largest and most prestigious law firms; defendant is another insurance company. Dealing at arm’s length and from positions of roughly equal bargaining strength, they negotiated a commercial loan amounting to more than $56 million. The contract documents are lengthy and detailed; they squarely address the precise issue that is the subject of this dispute; to all who read English, they appear to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Walker v. Community BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, a Partnership v. The Telex Corporation, a Corporation, and Telex Computer Products, Inc., AcorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  5. Delta Dynamics, Inc. v. AriotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. Nedlloyd Lines B v. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. McAbee Construction, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. Westlands Water DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2001
  4. Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Skilstaf, Inc. v. Cvs Caremark Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API