Trident Center v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge:
The parties to this transaction are, by any standard, highly sophisticated business people: Plaintiff is a partnership consisting of an insurance company and two of Los Angeles’ largest and most prestigious law firms; defendant is another insurance company. Dealing at arm’s length and from positions of roughly equal bargaining strength, they negotiated a commercial loan amounting to more than $56 million. The contract documents are lengthy and detailed; they squarely address the precise issue that is the subject of this dispute; to all who read English, they appear to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
- Walker v. Community BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, a Partnership v. The Telex Corporation, a Corporation, and Telex Computer Products, Inc., AcorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Delta Dynamics, Inc. v. AriotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- Nedlloyd Lines B v. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- McAbee Construction, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Westlands Water DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2001
- Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Skilstaf, Inc. v. Cvs Caremark Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.