Legal Opinion
Scott, Alfrieda S. v. Johanns, Michael
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 3, 2005No. 04-5267PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TATEL, Circuit Judge.
Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, federal employees dissatisfied with the administrative resolution of their discrimination complaints may file suit in federal court. In this case, we must decide whether an employee who secures a final administrative disposition finding discrimination but who is dissatisfied with the remedy may challenge only the remedy in the federal court action. Answering no, the district court held that the employee must first prove liability, and we agree.
I
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chandler v. RoudebushSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Second Amendment Foundation v. United States Conference of MayorsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- West v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Herbert K. Wilson v. Federico F. Pena, Secretary, Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Timmons v. CalderaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Stan Laber v. Francis J. Harvey, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- David W. Ellis, Jr. v. Gordon R. EnglandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Payne v. SalazarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- Coulibaly v. KerryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- James Coleman v. Elaine C. DukeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.