Legal Opinion
Timmons v. Caldera
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 6, 2003No. 02-7016PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Hunter S. Timmons, a former employee at the McAlester Army Ammunition Plant in McAlester, Oklahoma (“McAAP”), appeals from the judgment of the district court denying his motion for partial summary judgment and granting summary judgment in favor of the Secretary of the Army (“Defendant”). Mr. Tim-mons argues that the district court erred because, as a federal employee who has secured a finding of employment discrimination by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”), he is entitled to seek de novo review of the remedy awarded…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Chandler v. RoudebushSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Renegotiation Board v. Bannercraft Clothing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. First City National Bank of HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Stan Laber v. Francis J. Harvey, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- David W. Ellis, Jr. v. Gordon R. EnglandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Payne v. SalazarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- Halley v. HuckabyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Sanderson v. Wyoming Highway PatrolCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.