Legal Opinion
Payne v. Salazar
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided September 7, 2010No. 09-5291PublishedCited by 220 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GARLAND.
GARLAND, Circuit Judge:
This case raises an important and largely undecided issue under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. The government contends that a federal employee who wins one Title VII claim before her agency, but loses another, must put the first at risk in order to seek relief on the second in federal court. Finding no basis for the government’s interpretation of the statute, we reject that contention.
I
In Scott v. Johanns, 409 F.3d 466, 468-470 (D.C.Cir.2005), we explained the relevant statutory…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by220 opinions
- Gary Hamilton v. Timothy GeithnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Susan Morris v. Gina McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Artis v. BernankeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Achagzai v. Broadcasting Board of GovernorsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Laughlin v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
215 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.