Falk v. SUL AMERICA TERRESTRES MARITIMOS, ETC.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.
This is a declaratory judgment action challenging the refusal of defendant insurance company to defend a malpractice action. The two plaintiffs are osteopaths who were sued for malpractice. Defendant had malpractice insurance coverage for each plaintiff. It refused to defend the malpractice action on the grounds of failure of notice as required by the policies. Defendant claims, and the trial court found, that plaintiffs were aware of the potential claim for two years before they notified defendant. Plaintiffs defended the malpractice action which ended in a nonsuit. The mal practice action…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ferguson v. Birmingham Fire Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- Hoffman v. Employer's Liability Assurance Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1934
- City of Burns v. Northwestern Mutual InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1967
- Oregon Farm Bureau v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Oregon Farm Bureau Ins. Co. v. SAFECO INS. CO., A.Oregon Supreme Court · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- May v. Chicago Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Lusch v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Waller v. Rocky Mountain Fire and Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Aetna Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Oregon Automobile Insurance Co. v. FitzwaterOregon Supreme Court · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.