Legal Opinion
Oregon Farm Bureau Ins. Co. v. SAFECO INS. CO., A.
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided March 27, 1968PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.
This is an action by an insurance company to recover against two other insurance companies pro-rata contribution toward the settlement of one claim and the satisfaction of judgment in another claim arising out of an automobile accident for which the respective insurers were alleged to have provided multiple coverage. Safeco appeals from a judgment requiring contribution.
We do not reach the question whether the so-called Lamb-Weston formula (see Lamb-Weston v. Oregon Auto Ins. Co., 219 Or 110, 341 P2d 110, 346 P2d 643, 76 ALR2d 485 (1959)) for the adjustment of liabilities among multiple…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Hoffman v. Employer's Liability Assurance Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1934
3Cited by15 opinions
- Employers Ins. of Wausau v. Tektronix, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. SevierOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Great American Insurance v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Bailey v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Polygon Northwest Co. v. American National Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.