Legal Opinion

Inland Container, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 19, 1975No. 350-70PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam : This case comes before the court on exceptions by the parties to the recommended decision filed March 4, 1974, by Trial Judge David Schwartz, pursuant to Rule 134(h), having been submitted to the court on the briefs and oral argument of counsel. Upon consideration thereof, since the court agrees with the trial judge’s recommended decision, as hereinafter set forth, it hereby affirms and adopts the same as the basis for its judgment in this case. Therefore, it is concluded that plaintiff is entitled to recover and judgment is entered for plaintiff and against defendant in the sum…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. G. L. Christian and Associates v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  3. John Reiner & Company, Individually and to the Use of Kurz & Root Company (Incorporated) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  4. Harvey Ward Locke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
  5. WRB Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kalvar Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  2. Maxima Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  3. S. W. Electronics & Manufacturing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  4. Salem Engineering & Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  5. Design & Production, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API