Legal Opinion

Design & Production, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided September 14, 1989No. 553-84CPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HORN, Judge.

Plaintiff, Design and Production, Inc. (D & P), filed its complaint on October 26, 1984, pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613 (1982). The case was assigned to Judge Philip R. Miller. In its complaint, plaintiff alleges that defendant, through employees at the Department of Commerce, directed it to perform work outside the scope of the contract. Plaintiff has asked for an equitable adjustment in the contract price.

Prior to filing the complaint in this court, plaintiff submitted a certified, and then an amended certified claim, to the…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Wilber Nat. Bank of Oneonta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. WRB Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  4. Sylvania Electric Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  5. Emeco Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Design & Production, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  2. Northrop Grumman Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  3. Nicholson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  4. SIPCO Services & Marine Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  5. Nelson Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API