Legal Opinion
Sudbury v. Deterding
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 30, 2001No. 92,747PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWinchester, J.
1 1 The petitioner filed his petition against the respondents on May 15, 1996. He alleged that aerial overspraying of ultrahazardous chemicals by the respondents caused injury to his timber, and he sought treble damages pursuant to title 23, § 72. The date of the alleged injury was between May 16 and May 25, 1994.
T2 The respondents filed a motion for summary judgment alleging that the statute of limitations ran on the treble damages claim because the action was not filed within one year from the date of the occurrence. The district court granted the motion, finding the provisions of 12…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Special Indemnity Fund v. FigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Welch v. Union Mutual Insurance Co. of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Special Indemnity Fund v. BedfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Smith v. ColsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Tulsa Industrial Authority v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- Compsource Mut. Ins. Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- CNA Insurance Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Casey v. CaseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Shull v. ReidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.