Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. Lancaster Milk Company
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 6, 1960No. Civ. A. 6845PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOLLMER, District Judge.
This matter is presently before the Court on motions of the defendant to dismiss the action because the Complaint and “Amended Complaint” fail to state a claim against the defendant upon which relief can be granted, or, in the alternative, to dismiss the action for lack of jurisdiction.
On December 16, 1959, plaintiff filed a Complaint against defendant seeking to recover unpaid overtime compensation allegedly due Clyde Vanasdlen, an employee of the defendant, under the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Amendments of 1949 (Act of October 26, 1949, c. 736, 63 Stat.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fleming v. Hawkeye Pearl Button Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Musteen v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Crook v. BryantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
- Stratton v. Farmers Produce Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Shandelman v. SchumanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, U. S. Department of Labor v. The Behrens Drug CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Peter L. Knight, Dennis L. Wall, Michael D. Mulkey v. Columbus, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Soler v. G & U, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- William J. Davis, Inc. v. YoungDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Truslow v. Spotsylvania County SheriffDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.