Legal Opinion

Whisnant v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 1965No. 367PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNny, C.J.

The question posed for decision on this appeal is simply this: Is a single, personal use of an employer’s motor vehicle by an employee, which results in an accident, sufficient cause to exclude the benefits in a Medical Payments provision in an automobile liability insurance policy which excludes a nonowned automobile “furnished for regular use”?

The policy of insurance issued by the defendant included Medical Payments provision which covered the male plaintiff and his relatives, and required the defendant to pay to each such person a maximum of $500.00 in the event of bodily injury “while…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rodenkirk ex rel. Deitenbach v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945
  2. Pacific Automobile Insurance v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Miller v. Farmers Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  4. Vern v. Merchants Mutual Casualty Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1952
  5. Schoenknecht v. Prairie State Farmers InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. McGuire v. DraughonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. BullockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  4. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  5. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API