Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Bullock
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
On plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment the court considered the pleadings, stipulations and depositions of Pauline Bullock and Bertha Pool Bartlett, the operator and owner respectively of the vehicle involved in the accident.
Under the terms of the policy issued to Pauline Bullock’s husband, Pauline’s liability for the accident in question was not insured if the vehicle owned by Bertha Poole Bartlett was furnished for her regular use. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment should not have been granted if there existed a genuine question of fact material to this issue.
The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Devine v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- Whisnant v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Devine v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gaddy Ex Rel. Sox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Farmers Insurance Co. v. MorrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. WaltersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.