Legal Opinion

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Sturges

Texas Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 2001No. 98-1107PublishedCited by 424 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hecht

in which Chief Justice PHILLIPS, Justice ENOCH, Justice OWEN, and Justice ABBOTT joined, and in Parts I, IV and V of which Justice HANKINSON and Justice O’NEILL joined.

Texas, like most states, has long recognized a tort cause of action for interference *713with a prospective contractual or business relation even though the core concept of liability — what conduct is prohibited — has never been clearly defined. Texas courts have variously stated that a defendant may be hable for conduct that is “wrongful”, “malicious”, “improper”, of “no useful purpose”, “below the behavior of fair men similarly…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Johnson & Higgins of Texas, Inc. v. Kenneco Energy, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Financial Review Services, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. New Ulm Gas, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 1996

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by424 opinions

  1. Bradford v. VentoTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. S&w Enterprises, L.L.C., a Nevada Limited Liability Company v. Southtrust Bank of Alabama, Na, an Alabama Banking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  3. Calvin Walker v. Beaumont Indep School DistCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  4. Moncrief Oil International, Inc. v. Oao Gazprom, Gazprom Export, LLC, and Gazprom Marketing & Trading, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. GarzaTexas Supreme Court · 2004

419 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API