Legal Opinion

Bradford v. Vento

Texas Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 2001No. 99-0966PublishedCited by 837 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Abbott

In this case, Roell and Debra Vento sued the defendants alleging various causes of action — including fraud, tortious interference with prospective contractual relations, intentional infliction of emotional distress, DTPA violations, and civil conspiracy — arising out of their attempted purchase of a sports memorabilia store. We must decide whether legally sufficient evidence supports the jury’s verdict against Bruce Bradford, Simon Property Group, and Golden Ring Mall Company. The trial court rendered judgment on the verdict, holding the defendants jointly and severally liable for $1,274,000…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Randall's Food Markets, Inc. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Doe v. Boys Clubs of Greater Dallas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Amstadt v. United States Brass Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. SturgesTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Wornick Co. v. CasasTexas Supreme Court · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by837 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Dorsey v. Portfolio Equities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  3. Lee Lewis Construction, Inc. v. HarrisonTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Texas Department of Transportation v. NeedhamTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State Ex Rel. State Department of Highways & Public Transportation v. GonzalezTexas Supreme Court · 2002

832 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API