Legal Opinion

Moncrief Oil International, Inc. v. Oao Gazprom, Gazprom Export, LLC, and Gazprom Marketing & Trading, Ltd.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 2013No. 11-0195PublishedCited by 371 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Guzman

We have observed that the business contacts needed for specific personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant “are generally a matter of physical fact, while tort liability (especially misrepresentation cases) turns on what the parties thought, said, or intended. Far better that judges should limit their jurisdictional decisions to the former rather than involving themselves in trying the latter.” 1 Here, nonresident defendants allegedly committed the tort of misappropriating purported trade secrets from a Texas company concerning a proposed Texas venture during two meetings in Texas.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by371 opinions

  1. TV Azteca v. RuizTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Jason R. Searcy, as Trustee of the Exempt Assets Trust v. Parex Resources, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Old Republic Nat'l Title Ins. Co. v. BellTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  4. M & F Worldwide Corp. v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Cornerstone Healthcare Group Holding, Inc. v. Nautic Partners Vi, L.P., Reliant Splitter, L.P., and Kennedy Plaza Partners Vi, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2016

366 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API