Legal Opinion

United States v. Medquest Associates, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided March 24, 2010No. 3:06-1169PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

WILLIAM J. HAYNES, JR., District Judge.

Plaintiff, Karen Hobbs, a former Med-Quest employee filed this action as relator on behalf of the United States under the False Claims Act (“FCA”) 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 through 3733 against the Defendants: MedQuest Associates, Inc., (“Med-Quest”), Bioimaging at Charlotte, Inc., (“Charlotte Center”), Bioimaging of Coolsprings, Inc. (“Coolsprings Center”) and Bioimaging at Harding, Inc. (“Harding Center”). On March 31, 2009, the Government notified the Court of its decision to intervene and filed its intervening complaint on May 22, 2009. (Docket…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  4. United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Edwin P. Harrison, and United States of America, Party in Interest v. Westinghouse Savannah River CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Hobbs v. MedQuest Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  2. Parker v. The Cincinnati Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2022
  3. Showman v. Q Corporate Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024
  4. USA Parking Systems, LLC v. Eastern Gateway Community CollegeDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API