Legal Opinion
State v. Azar
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 26, 2019No. Case No. 19-cv-01184-EMC; Case No. 19-cv-01195-EMCPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
I. BACKGROUND
A. Statutory and Regulatory Background
1. Title X
The Public Health Service Act ("PHSA"), an expansive statutory scheme that consolidated existing public health laws and established various agencies and grant programs to support health care and research, was enacted in 1944. In 1970, Congress amended the PHSA to add "Title X-Population Research and Voluntary Family Planning Programs." Pub. L. No. 91-572, § 6, 84 Stat. 1504, 1506-08 (1970) (codified at 42 U.S.C. §§ 300 - 300a-6 ). Title X authorizes the Secretary of HHS "to make grants to and enter into contracts with public or…
2Cases cited86 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State of California v. Alex Azar, IICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Mayor of Balt. v. AzarDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019
- California by and through Becerra v. AzarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- FAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF MAINE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICESDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020
- Mayor and City Council Of Baltimore v. AzarDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.