Legal Opinion

Jaylo v. Jaylo

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 2011No. SCWC-27851PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

DUFFY, J.

DefendanF-Appellant Aldo Macapal Jaylo (Father) presents this court with a ease of first impression: whether Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) section 580-47(a) authorized the family court to order educational support for a disabled but competent child age 23 or older when the 2004 Family Court’s Amended Child Support Guidelines (2004 Guidelines) established pursuant to HRS § 576D-7 provided that such support may be continued only until the child attains the age of 23. The family court answered this question “Yes”. 1 We agree, for the reasons discussed herein.

I.BAC…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gray v. Administrative Director of CourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. DannenbergHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Hawaii Government Employees Ass'n, AFSCME Local 152 v. LingleHawaii Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Fisher v. FisherHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. Hussein.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kakinami v. KakinamiHawaii Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Kakinami v. KakinamiHawaii Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Kakinami v. KakinamiHawaii Supreme Court · 2012
  4. P.O. v. J.S.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017
  5. PO v. JS.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API