Legal Opinion

State v. Dannenberg

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1992No. 16213PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

LUM, C.J.

Petitioner State of Hawaii (State) moved this court to issue a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition enjoining the enforcement of an order granting respondent-defendant Brian Uy’s (Defendant) motion for a Deferred Acceptance of a No Contest (DANC) plea issued by respondent Judge James Dannenberg, Judge of the District Court of the First Circuit.

Upon consideration of State’s petition, this court holds that the trial court manifestly abused its discretion by granting Defendant’s motion for a deferred acceptance of no contest. Therefore, this court grants the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. KumukauHawaii Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. JohnsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. UiHawaii Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Honolulu Star Bulletin, Ltd. v. BurnsHawaii Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State Ex Rel. Marsland v. ShintakuHawaii Supreme Court · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Gray v. Administrative Director of CourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Ross v. Stouffer Hotel Co. (Hawai'i) Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Briones v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. WellsHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. OntiverosHawaii Supreme Court · 1996

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API