Kakinami v. Kakinami
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by
ACOBA, J.,
with whom McKENNA, J., Joins.
I would hold that (1) Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 580-47 plainly and unambiguously vests family courts with the discretion to equitably “divid[e] and distribute] the estate of the parties, real, personal, or mixed, whether community, joint, or separate [,] ” in divorce proceedings (emphases added); (2) in addition to the plain language of HRS § 580-47, its legislative history and the controlling ease law in this jurisdiction confirm that the discretion afforded family courts under HRS § 580-47 encompasses the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. KalamaHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
- Citizens for the Protection of the North Kohala Coastline Ex Rel. Withington v. County of Hawai'iHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
- Carson v. CarsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
- Gussin v. GussinHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
- Au-Hoy v. Au-HoyHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.