Legal Opinion

Kakinami v. Kakinami

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 2012No. SCWC-29340PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

RECKTENWALD, C.J.

Aaron Kakinami challenges the Family Court of the Fifth Circuit’s Supplemental Divorce Decree, on the ground that the family court erred in not awarding him a share of Bonnie Kakinami’s Marital Separate Property.1 Aaron also argues that the family court improperly modified the Supplemental Divorce Decree after he filed his Notice of Appeal by compelling him to pay Bonnie a net share of her interest in the marital residence by a certain date.

Briefly stated, Aaron and Bonnie were married in 1980. In 2006 Bonnie filed a complaint for divorce, alleging the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In the Interest of DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Fujimoto v. AuHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Bitney v. Honolulu Police DepartmentHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  4. E & J Lounge Operating Co. v. Liquor Commission of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Gussin v. GussinHawaii Supreme Court · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Balogh v. BaloghHawaii Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Gordon v. Gordon.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Hamilton v. Hamilton.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Collins v. Wassell.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2014
  5. PO v. JSHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API