In Re Chesna
Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BACKGROUND
The Judicial Conduct Board commenced this matter on September 30,1994 by filing a formal complaint in this Court pursuant to Article Y, Section 18(a)(7) and 18(b)(5). The complaint consisted of six counts, alleging that respondent Robert S. Chesna engaged in conduct sanctionable by this Court. Pursuant to the Interim Rules of Procedure Governing the Court of Judicial Discipline then in effect, respondent was served with the complaint and notified that procedure would be governed by the Interim Rules of Procedure Governing the Court of Judicial Discipline then in effect. Interim Rule…
Also in this document: Per curiam 1; Per curiam 2; Per curiam 3.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re CainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Judicial Inquiry & Review Board v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Anonymous Attorney ASupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re StrockCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2003
- In Re LarsenCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 1998
- In Re SullivanCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2003
- In Re MurphyCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2010
- In re SingletaryCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.