In Re Larsen
Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
PANELLA, Judge.
Before the Court is the Amended Omnibus Pretrial Motion of the Respondent, former Supreme Court Justice Rolf Larsen. An en banc argument was held on May 27, 1998.
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This case has a complicated and beleaguered history. Proceedings against the Respondent were instituted by the Judicial Conduct Board on March 10, 1994, when the Board filed an Application with this Court which requested that we suspend the Respondent with pay.1 The Application, which was docketed to Number 3 JD 94, was primarily based on the filing of a criminal information,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Office of the Disciplinary Counsel v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Berlant AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- In the Matter of Julius Lucius Echeles, an AttorneyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- Judicial Inquiry & Review Board v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. LarsenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. JepsenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- In Re SullivanCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2003
- In Re LarsenCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2000
- In Re Appeal of Larsen, United States Special Tribunals of Pennsylvania2002
- In re SingletaryCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2012
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.