Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Anonymous Attorney A

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 18, 1991No. J-109-1990 thru J-116-1990PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CAPPY, Justice.

The question presented to this Court is whether the *86Judicial Inquiry and Review Board (JIRB)1 has exclusive jurisdiction to discipline Judicial officers for misconduct; so as to preclude action by the Disciplinary Board2 against those same Judicial officers who are also attorneys registered to practice law in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. We find that exclusive jurisdiction lies with JIRB and reverse in part and affirm in part, although for other reasons, the order of the Disciplinary Board.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

We address the eight separate appeals in a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Com.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Matter of CunninghamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. In re GreenbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Judicial Inquiry & Review Board v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Matter of DalessandroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. JepsenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. In Re LarsenCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. In Re ChesnaCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. In Re SullivanCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. In Re LarsenCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API