Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Anonymous Attorney A
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CAPPY, Justice.
The question presented to this Court is whether the *86Judicial Inquiry and Review Board (JIRB)1 has exclusive jurisdiction to discipline Judicial officers for misconduct; so as to preclude action by the Disciplinary Board2 against those same Judicial officers who are also attorneys registered to practice law in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. We find that exclusive jurisdiction lies with JIRB and reverse in part and affirm in part, although for other reasons, the order of the Disciplinary Board.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
We address the eight separate appeals in a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Com.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Matter of CunninghamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- In re GreenbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Judicial Inquiry & Review Board v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Matter of DalessandroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. JepsenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- In Re LarsenCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 1998
- In Re ChesnaCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 1995
- In Re SullivanCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2003
- In Re LarsenCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.