Legal Opinion

In Re Cain

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 29, 1991No. J.I.R.B. Docket 143PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

The issue presented in this appeal is whether Article V, Section 18(Z) of the Pennsylvania Constitution may be applied to a senior judge. We conclude that Article Y, Section 18(Z) is applicable to a senior judge regardless of whether the senior judge is acting in such capacity at the time removal from judicial office is sought.

The Judicial Inquiry and Review Board (JIRB) filed a Petition to Implement Automatic Forfeiture of Judicial Office, which was subsequently amended, requesting this Court to issue a rule to show cause why Judge Herbert R. Cain, Jr. should not be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re GrossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Judicial Inquiry & Review Board v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Matter of GlanceySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Pap's A.M. v. City of ErieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. In the Interest of R.D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. In re D.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Town of McCandless v. McCandless Police Officers Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. J.S. v. WhetzelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API