Hartness v. United States
District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
RICE, District Judge.
The defendant United States of America filed herein its motion to dismiss, for the reason that the plaintiff’s action is barred by the statute of limitation and this court is without jurisdiction to hear said cause. Thereafter, the following stipulation was entered into by the attorneys. for plaintiff and defendant:
“It is stipulated and agreed by counsel for respective sides that Clarence Hartness was inducted .into the military service of the United States on April 26, 1918 and was honorably discharged June 20, 1919; that while in the service he applied for and was"…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Weaver v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
- Corn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Stallman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- United States v. GowerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- United States v. ThomsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
3Cited by2 opinions
- Walden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
- Atkinson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1941