Newton v. South Carolina Public Railways Commission
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Finney, Chief Justice:
This is a negligence case. The trial judge granted petitioner’s (Commission’s) Rule 12(b)(6), SCRCP, motion, finding respondent’s complaint failed to allege legal cause. Respondent appealed, and the Court of Appeals reversed. Newton v. South Carolina Public Railways Comm’n, 312 S.C. 107, 439 S.E. (2d) 285 (Ct. App. 1993). We granted certiorari, and reverse.
The Commission was responsible for the maintenance of a train crossing signal. The signal was out of order for several days, constantly signalling an imminent train. Respondent came upon the malfunctioning signal and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bramlette Ex Rel. Estate of Bramlette v. Charter-Medical-ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
- Dunnivant v. NafeTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
- Newton v. South Carolina Public Railways CommissionCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
3Cited by9 opinions
- Vinson v. HartleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
- Small v. Pioneer MacHinery, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
- Food Lion, Inc. v. Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1997
- Hurd v. Williamsburg CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
- Platt v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.