Legal Opinion

Newton v. South Carolina Public Railways Commission

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 18, 1995No. 24312PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Finney, Chief Justice:

This is a negligence case. The trial judge granted petitioner’s (Commission’s) Rule 12(b)(6), SCRCP, motion, finding respondent’s complaint failed to allege legal cause. Respondent appealed, and the Court of Appeals reversed. Newton v. South Carolina Public Railways Comm’n, 312 S.C. 107, 439 S.E. (2d) 285 (Ct. App. 1993). We granted certiorari, and reverse.

The Commission was responsible for the maintenance of a train crossing signal. The signal was out of order for several days, constantly signalling an imminent train. Respondent came upon the malfunctioning signal and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bramlette Ex Rel. Estate of Bramlette v. Charter-Medical-ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  2. Dunnivant v. NafeTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Newton v. South Carolina Public Railways CommissionCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Vinson v. HartleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  2. Small v. Pioneer MacHinery, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  3. Food Lion, Inc. v. Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1997
  4. Hurd v. Williamsburg CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  5. Platt v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API