Legal Opinion

Hurd v. Williamsburg County

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 17, 2003No. 3614PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, J.:

Jack Hurd brought this tort action against Williamsburg County and Williamsburg County Transit Authority (collectively referred to as the “County”), alleging damages resulting from an automobile-pedestrian collision that occurred when he was struck by an automobile after exiting a bus. A jury trial was held and Hurd was awarded $675,000 in damages. The verdict was reduced under the mandate of the South Carolina Tort Claims Act. The County appeals. We affirm.

*603 FACTSIPROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Hurd boarded the County’s bus around 6 a.m. on February 1,1996 to go to work in Myrtle Beach.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Clark v. CantrellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Bishop v. South Carolina Department of Mental HealthSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  3. Welch v. EpsteinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  4. Young Ex Rel. Estate of Young v. Tide Craft, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  5. Nelson v. Concrete Supply CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hurd v. Williamsburg CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  2. Sims v. HallCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  3. Jessco, Inc. v. Builders Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  4. Andrea Sherman, as Parent and Natural Guardian of M.D., Minor v. The Scotts Company, LLC, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., and Jaycee Foust, Jr.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2026
  5. Ardis v. SessionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API