Legal Opinion

Newton v. South Carolina Public Railways Commission

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided December 6, 1993No. 2091PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Connor, Judge:

As noted by the trial judge, this case of the “railroad signal that cried wolf’ presents issues that seem to have been devised by a professor for a law school examination. The action is one in negligence. Cheryl O. Newton (Newton) sued the South Carolina Public Railways Commission (Railroad) for injuries she sustained at a Port Royal railroad crossing when she was rear-ended by another vehicle. Newton alleges she stopped at a railroad crossing where lights were flashing and bells were ringing. Moreover, she claims the Railroad was aware this situation had existed for several…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jensen Ex Rel. Estate of Clark v. Anderson County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. Bramlette Ex Rel. Estate of Bramlette v. Charter-Medical-ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  3. Hughes Ex Rel. Hughes v. Children's Clinic, P. A.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  4. Ballou v. Sigma Nu General FraternityCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  5. Brown v. LeveretteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Vinson v. HartleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  2. Small v. Pioneer MacHinery, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  3. Newton v. South Carolina Public Railways CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  4. Platt v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  5. Newton v. South Carolina Public Railways CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API