Legal Opinion

Herrold v. Reen

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1881No. 7,239PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in the Superior Court of Santa Clara County. Spencer, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Thornton, J.:

This was an action to foreclose a mortgage, executed by the defendant to the plaintiff on a lot of land situated in San José. The defendant set up by answer as a defense the following :

“ Further answering, the defendant avers and shows to the Court, that on the 1st day of May, A. D. 1860, she and one Peter Reen were, and for a long time prior thereto had been husband and wife; and as such husband and wife they were the owners in fee of the land and premises described in the complaint herein as community property, and were then living in their dwelling-house thereon with their…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re Estate of DelaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Rich v. TubbsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  3. In re Estate of HeadenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Levins v. RovegnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Collins v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Sanders v. RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Tyrrell v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Hannon v. Southern Pac. R. R. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API