Hannon v. Southern Pac. R. R. Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The question of law involved on this appeal was submitted to the trial court upon stipulation, and Justice Lucien Shaw, now of the supreme court, then on the superior bench, in deciding the case, wrote an opinion which is quoted in the brief of respondents. It is as follows:
“This is an action to recover the possession of the undivided two-thirds of a tract of real estate. The land in ques tion was the separate property of Patrick Hannon, the father of the plaintiffs, at the time of his marriage to Catherine Hannon, the mother of plaintiffs, on June 8, 1874. On June 19, 1874,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gee v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Levins v. RovegnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Barber v. BabelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- In Re the Estate of FathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Revalk v. KraemerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Siberell v. SiberellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Prager v. IsrealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- In Re Estate of HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Shaw v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- In Re Estate of GurnseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.