Legal Opinion

Bell v. State Industrial Accident Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1937PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

This case began as an appeal by the plaintiff to the circuit court for Washington county from certain orders of the appellant, State Industrial Accident Commission, denying him compensation for an accidental injury which he sustained while working for the intervenor and respondent, Z. J. Riggs. Riggs was brought into the case by a demand for intervention filed by the commission pursuant to the purported authority of chapter 144, Laws 1935, section 49-1822-a, Oregon Code Supplement 1935, which reads as follows:

“If a workman of an employer engaged in a hazardous occupation shall receive an…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Rohde v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1923

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lane County v. R. A. Heintz Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Dimitroff v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Allen v. Lindbeck, Justice of the PeaceUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Demers v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Gooch v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API