Legal Opinion

Smith v. Hood Rubber Products Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 22, 1935No. 25084PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

This is an appeal from the district court of Caddo county. The cause was taken to the district court on appeal from the justice of the peace court; plaintiff in error was defendant in the justice of the peace court, and was plaintiff in the district court. The parties will be herein referred to as plaintiff and defendant, as they appeared in the justice of the peace court.

Plaintiff brought suit in the justice of the peace court on open account. Defendant admitted a portion of the account and denied a part of same; trial resulted in judgment for plaintiff for the full amount claimed. Upon…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Baker v. NewtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Tate v. StoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Gaddis v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Hesser v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  5. Matheny v. Bank of NashvilleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rochelle v. SharpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API