Legal Opinion

Rochelle v. Sharp

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 13, 1938No. 27773PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

This is an appeal from the county court of Pottawatomie county wherein the defendant in error obtained judgment against plaintiff in error upon a promissory note. We will refer to the parties as plaintiff and defendant, as they appeared in the trial court.

It is first urged that this anneal should be dismissed because the case-made is not (he same as served upon plaintiff’s attorneys. It appears that a case-made was served on November 7, 1936; that on February 12, 1937, the trial court made certain nunc pro tunc orders which were then incorporated in the case-made. It is insisted by plaintiff…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. St. Louis. S. F. R. Co. v. TaliaferroSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Peters v. HolderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Fowlkes v. Central Supply Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  4. School District No. 84 v. Asher School Dist. No. 112Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Kriewitz v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ridenour v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951
  2. Jones v. Nicoma Park Radio & Television ServiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  3. Overstreet v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  4. City of Anchorage v. AndersonDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API