Legal Opinion

Messett v. Cowell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1938No. 26933. Department OnePublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeraghty, J.

Henry Cowell agreed in writing to sell to one Boarman, for nine thousand dollars, a tract of land, embracing seventy-eight acres, containing a deposit of lime rock and situate on Oreas Island, in San Juan county. The land was sold subject to the condition that neither the purchaser nor his successors in interest should use any of the lime rock on the premises for the purpose of making or burning lime.

At this time, Cowell was extensively engaged in the production of lime in the state of California, and was owner of practically all of the stock in the Henry Cowell Lime and Cement Company, a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hodge v. . SloanNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Wakefield v. VanTassellIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Starkey v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Starkey v. . GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Morris & Morris v. Tuskaloosa Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1887

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Olympia v. PalzerWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Alvin v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. Buckalew v. NiehussSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  4. Colby v. McLaughlinWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Connor v. Automated Accounts, Inc.District Court, E.D. Washington · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API