Legal Opinion

Connor v. Automated Accounts, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Washington

Decided August 10, 2001No. CS-99-0270-EFSPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION

SHEA, District Judge.

On April 5, 2001, the Court heard oral argument on Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification, (Ct. Rec. 23). Plaintiff Connor was represented by Michael D. Kinkley. Defendant Automated Accounts, Inc., (“Automated Accounts”) was represented by Hugh T. Lackie and Margaret L. Arpin. Pursuant to the Court’s April 30, 2001, Order Directing Briefing on Certification of Actual Damages Question, (Ct. Rec. 67), Plaintiff and Defendant each filed supplemental memoranda on the issue of damages, (Ct. Rees. 68, 69). The…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. David Hanon v. Dataproducts Corporation Jack C. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tripp v. Berman & Rabin, P.A.District Court, D. Kansas · 2015
  2. Hansen v. Ticket Track, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2003
  3. Jones v. Advanced Bureau of Collections LLPDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API