Starkey v. Gardner
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BkogdeN,' J.
The question is this: Under what circumstances are restrictive covenants in deeds for property, originally devoted to residential purposes, rendered unenforceable?
There is no allegation in the complaint and no finding of fact by the trial judge that the Haywood Road property was the result of a general *77plan or scheme other than tbe fact that tbe original deeds contained restrictions as set out in tbe deeds of tbe plaintiffs and tbe defendant.
Tbe question of restrictive covenants in deeds covering property designed for residential purposes exclusively is becoming more and more an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rowland v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Ward v. Prospect Manor Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Stevenson v. SpiveySupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
- Bailey v. Jackson-Campbell Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Ronberg v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by30 opinions
- Tull v. Doctors Building, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Humphrey v. . BeallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Medearis v. Trustees of Myers Park Baptist ChurchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Goodwin Bros. v. Combs Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- Hemphill v. CayceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.