Legal Opinion

Krapf v. Arthur

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 13, 1928No. Appeal 139PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

The defendant conducts a wholesale lumber business at Lansford, Schuylkill County. The claimant, Andrew L. Krapf, who resides in Tamaqua, was employed by the defendant as a bookkeeper and salesman at a salary of $150 per month, with an additional allowance of $10 per month for his trolley fares between the two towns. He worked about half of the time as bookkeeper at the defendant’s office and the other half of the time he spent as a travelling salesman, visiting lumber dealers within a convenient radius of Lansford. His office hours were from 8:00 A. M. to 5:00 P. M.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Callihan v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Haddock v. Edgewater Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  3. Palko v. Taylor-Mccoy C. C. Co. (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Maguire v. James Lees & Sons Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Knorr v. Central RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Cronin v. American Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Baumann v. Howard J. Ehmke Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Haas v. Brotherhood of Transportation WorkersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Leinbach Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Lillian Haley v. City of Phila.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API