Legal Opinion

Courteau v. Interlake S. S. Co.

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided January 21, 1941No. 20PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAYMOND, District Judge.

Prior to the dismissal of this case as to defendant Thomson, trustee, etc., plaintiff filed motion for an order requiring defendants, Interlake Steamship Company and Thomson, trustee, etc., to produce and permit the inspection of certain documents and the photographing of certain objects. Because of the order of dismissal, the motion is now before the court for consideration only as to defendant The Interlake Steamship Company.

This defendant makes no objection to an order being entered as prayed in paragraphs 1 (c), 1 (d), and 2 of the motion. This leaves for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. PalmerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1939
  2. Thomas French & Sons, Ltd. v. Carleton Venetian Blind Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1939
  3. Pierce v. Submarine Signal Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1939
  4. C. F. Simonin's Sons, Inc. v. American Can Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1938

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
  2. Stark v. American Dredging Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Stewart-Warner Corp. v. StaleyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Midland Steel Products Co. v. Clark Equipment Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1945
  5. Dowd v. American S. S. Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API