Legal Opinion
Pierce v. Submarine Signal Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided January 5, 1939No. 4663PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWEENEY, District Judge.
This is an action wherein the plaintiff seeks recovery for alleged infringement of certain patents. Interrogatories have been filed to which some answers have been made by the defendant. On August 29, 1938, the defendant filed objections to certain of the interrogatories, and these objections are now before me for decision. On December 7, 1938, the defendant filed a motion for summary judgment under.Rule 56(b), 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, which is accompanied by certain supporting affidavits. The plaintiff has filed counter-affidavits. I will first dispose of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Richmond Screw Anchor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Carpenter v. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- Safeway Stores v. Marvin Fannan, Marvin Fannan v. Safeway StoresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Nakken Patents Corp. v. RabinowitzDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1940
- Fulmer v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1949
- Molinaro v. Watkins-Johnson CEI DivisionDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.