Legal Opinion

Malabed v. North Slope Borough

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided April 8, 1999No. N98-0004 CV (JWS)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER FROM CHAMBERS

SEDWICK, District Judge.

J. MOTIONS PRESENTED

This case challenges an employment preference adopted by the North Slope Borough (“NSB”) to hire Native Americans for all NSB jobs. At docket 7, defendant North Slope Borough Transit Department (“North Slope Transit”) 1 moves to dismiss the complaint. 2 Plaintiff Robert Malabed (“Malabed”) opposes the motion and cross-moves for partial summary judgment at docket 14. Oral argument was heard in Fairbanks on April 7,1999.

II. BACKGROUND

NSB is a political subdivision of the State of Alaska. NSB’s population is approximately 74 percent…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Artichoke Joe's v. NortonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2002
  2. State v. FrankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
  3. American Federation of Government Employees v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
  4. Fox v. PORTICO REALITY SERVICES OFFICEDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
  5. Pearson v. CHUGACH GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC.District Court, D. Delaware · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API