Fox v. PORTICO REALITY SERVICES OFFICE
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
T.S. ELLIS, III, District Judge.
This race discrimination ease brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 1 presents the question — not yet addressed in the federal courts' whether the indirect subsidiary of an Alaska Native Corporation is excepted from the scope of Title VIPs prohibition on unlawful employment practices on the ground that the indirect subsidiary is not a Title VII “employer” under 43 U.S.C. § 1626(g). In this case, defendant Portico Reality Services Office (“Portico”) 2 argues on summary judgment that it is not an “employer” subject to Title VII…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Robert Louis Roseboro v. Sam P. Garrison, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Warden of Central PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Daniels v. Chugach Government Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Garrett v. Cape Fox Facilities ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2020
- Hannah v. Koman Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024
- Laredo Ridge Wind, LLC v. Nebraska Public Power DistrictDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2020