Legal Opinion

Penn West Associates, Inc. v. Cohen

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 9, 2004No. 02-4344PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

AMBRO, Circuit Judge.

We review the District Court’s November 5, 2002 order denying the motion of Penn West Associates, Inc. (“Penn West”) to re-open its civil RICO case. That case was administratively closed by order of the District Court on August 19, 1999, after both parties informed the Court that they tentatively settled their dispute. In fact, the civil RICO case was not concluded. The District Court mistook its administrative closure of the case as a final decision, which mistakenly led it to treat Penn West’s motion to re-open the case and list it for trial as one…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. United States v. IndrelunasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. United States v. Joseph FiorelliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Santamarina, Guiller v. Sears RoebuckCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  2. Ronald Cup v. Ampco Pittsburgh CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  3. Penn West Associates, Inc. v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  4. Kaiser Group International, Inc. v. Mittal Steel Ostrava, A.S. (In Re Kaiser Group International, Inc.)District Court, D. Delaware · 2009
  5. Tucker v. American International Group, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API