Legal Opinion
Ronald Cup v. Ampco Pittsburgh Corp
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 29, 2018No. 17-2349PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge.
*60 This case involves a dispute over retiree healthcare benefits. Retired union member Ronald Cup and similarly situated retirees requested-and the District Court ordered-arbitration of the dispute under the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), 29 U.S.C. § 185 . Ampco Pittsburgh Corporation, its subsidiary Akers National Roll Company, and Akers' health and welfare benefit plan (collectively, the Company) filed this appeal, arguing that the District Court erred when it ordered arbitration. The appeal raises important questions of appellate jurisdiction and contract…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Diane Blair v. Scott Specialty Gases Thomas Barford Jerry StumpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Kenneth P. Bidlack v. Wheelabrator CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- M&G Polymers United States, LLC v. TackettSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Donohue v. New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2018
- Local Union 97 v. NRG Energy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
- Krey ex rel. All Persons Similarly Situated Formerly Known All Persons Similarly Situated v. CuomoDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2018
- Lillian Roberts Dir. of Dist. Council 37, Afscme ex rel. Situated v. CuomoDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2018
- N.Y.S. Law Enforcement Officers Union Council 82 v. CuomoDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2018
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.