Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Rosenberg & Wolfe
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 4, 1943PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFroessel, J.
Motion to confirm an arbitration award and for judgment thereon. Cross motion to vacate and set aside said award on various grounds.
The agreement to arbitrate discloses that “ an altercation between the parties occurred on July 3, 1942 wherein verbal exchanges took place and blows were struck,” as a consequence of which petitioner Rosenberg charged respondent Wolfe with simple assault. At the suggestion of the magistrate, the parties, who were adjoining neighbors, “ agreed to submit and adjust their differences entirely through arbitration.” Accordingly, the pending charge in the Magistrates’…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stefano Berizzi Co. v. KrauszNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Van Cortlandt v. UnderhillCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1819
- Matter of A.E. Fire Ins. Co. v. N.J. Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
- In re the Arbitration between Friedman & FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Jacobowitz v. HersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Karppinen v. Karl Kiefer MacHine Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Cassara v. WoffordSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
- Gervant v. New England Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Pawlicki v. Farmers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
- In re the Arbitration between First National Oil Corp. & ArrietaNew York Supreme Court · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.