Miller v. Cortese
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
DRAPEAU, J.—
This is an action to recover a real estate broker’s commission for $20,000. Plaintiff is assignee of the broker, Alden B. Coyne. The cause was dismissed as to defendants Córtese and Bershim and defendant Dinow filed his answer. Thereafter the latter died and the action was revived on motion and a supplemental complaint was served on Celia A. Dinow, as administratrix of the estate of Mike E. Dinow, deceased.
Thereafter, the trial court granted the motion of Celia A. Dinow, as administratrix, etc., for permission to file her amended answer to the complaint and the supplemental…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Moore v. BorgfeldtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Hicks v. PostCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Baird v. MadsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Love v. GulyasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Rice Lands & Products Co. v. BlevinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Miller v. CorteseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Lynn v. K. C. Ranches, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1967