Legal Opinion

Miller v. Cortese

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 6, 1955No. Civ. 20991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

On the trial of this case, judgment was rendered in favor of defendant Celia A. Dinow, as administratrix of the estate of Meyer Ernest Dinow. Plaintiff appealed. (See Miller v. Cortese, 125 Cal.App.2d 656 [271 P.2d 87].) Petition for hearing in the Supreme Court was denied on July 28, 1954. Upon the remittitur coming down on August 2, 1954, defendant caused a memorandum of costs on appeal to be served and filed on August 12, 1954. The only items listed thereon were (1) Respondent’s brief $238.13, and (2) Answer re petition, Supreme Court, $117.83; total $355.96. The cost bill was verified by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Estate of RabinowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. McKeon v. SambranoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Rosenfield v. VosperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Lapique v. KelleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. Miller v. CorteseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Edgington v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  2. Call v. Los Angeles County General HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Edgington v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API