Legal Opinion
Savoy v. Richard A. Carrier Trucking, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided March 19, 1998No. CIV.A. No. 97-30006-MAPPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WITH REGARD TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO COMPEL (Docket No. 6b)
NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Defendant United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company (“Fidelity”) has moved that J. Michael Scully (“Scully”), one of Patricia S. Savoy (“Plaintiff’)’s attorneys, be compelled to answer certain questions propounded to him during his deposition. Fidelity’s motion is made in conjunction with a motion to disqualify both Scully and Attorney Francis D. Dibble, Jr. (“Dibble”), Scully’s co-counsel. For the following reasons and within the limits of guidance which the court provides,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mead Data Central, Inc. v. United States Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Darius v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Bacchi v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- Ausherman v. Bank of America Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Bacchi v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- Darius ex rel. Darius v. BriscoeMassachusetts Superior Court · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.