Legal Opinion

Babcock v. City of Kansas City

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 5, 1966No. 44,682PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fatzer, J.:

This was an action in the nature of quo warranto brought by the plaintiff, Warren H. Babcock, an individual, challenging the validity of seven annexation ordinances enacted by the city of Kansas City and published between February 11, 1965, and *611June 4, 1965, which substantially enlarged the city both as to population and area.

Issues were formed by the parties’ pleadings and the case was tried to the district court of Wyandotte County, sitting en banc, upon the parties’ written stipulation of facts. The five judges of the district court made…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Craft v. Com'rs Jackson Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  2. City of Topeka v. DwyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. State ex rel. Wheat v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  4. State Ex Rel. Osborn v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  5. Miller v. Town of PalermoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Frazier v. GoudschaalSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  2. City of Kansas City v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  3. Sabatini v. Jayhawk Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  4. Cranston Teachers Ass'n v. Cranston School CommitteeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
  5. City of Lenexa v. City of OlatheSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API